Prior to 2020, if you heard the term \u201clockdown\u201d you might think of something that happens in a prison \u2014 not in a free society. This mechanism of control has since become commonplace \u2014 not among prisoners but among the free \u2014 with repercussions that are only beginning to be understood.<\/p>\n
The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe. Already banned by Facebook and YouTube,1<\/span><\/sup> the film starts at the beginning of the pandemic, when we were told lockdowns were necessary to \u201cflatten the curve.\u201d<\/p>\n This was supposed to be a short-term, 15-day event in the U.S., but the narrative soon changed to ongoing restrictions. As Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, now owned by Novartis, explained, people have historically quarantined the sick, but quarantining healthy people, as has occurred for the past two years, has no scientific backing or historic precedence.2<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n \u201cGiven this virus represents, at most, a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than seasonal influenza, and a less risk, a smaller risk, to almost everyone else who\u2019s younger and fit,\u201d Yeadon says, \u201cit was never necessary for us to have done anything. We didn\u2019t need to do anything \u2014 lockdowns, masks, testing, vaccines even.\u201d3<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that seemed to be coaching him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis in situations where he wouldn\u2019t have previously used influenza or any other specific viral diagnosis without first testing for it. He said:4<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n \u201cWhat struck me right away was I felt like I was being coached to go ahead and use COVID-19 without using the same standards of precision that I would for other things. If I\u2019m going to make a diagnosis, I believe as a physician I have an obligation to use the tools available to me to nail it down with as much certainty as possible.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n And it seemed to me that the Department of Health, and the link to this CDC document that said you could diagnose COVID-19 as a cause of death on a death certificate \u2026 those two documents, in tandem, went against everything that I had been taught or doing for the last 35 years.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Even Dr. Ngozi Ezike, director of the Illinois Department of Health, is featured in the film stating that even if you died of a clear alternate cause, if you had COVID-19 at the same time, it would still be listed as a COVID death. \u201cEveryone who is listed as a COVID death, doesn\u2019t mean that was the cause of the death,\u201d she says.5<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n In January 2020, the PCR test for COVID-19 came out, which allowed health officials to define COVID-19 \u201ccases.\u201d If the test was positive, it counted as a case \u2014 it didn\u2019t matter if you have symptoms or not. Reiner Fuellmich, global fraud attorney, founder of the Corona Investigative Committee, pointed out, \u201cIt\u2019s never, in the history of mankind, in the history of medicine, there\u2019s never been testing of healthy people.\u201d6<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n Yeadon agrees that mass testing of people with no symptoms has no scientific basis. Rather, he says, \u201cIt\u2019s just a way to frighten people.\u201d7<\/span><\/sup> The rising \u201ccases,\u201d based on PCR testing, is what built the crisis. But counting cases was only measuring the activity of testing; the more that testing occurred, the more cases that were found.<\/p>\n June 8, 2020, WHO director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced that asymptomatic people could transmit COVID-19. That same day, Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that people who have COVID-19 without any symptoms \u201crarely\u201d transmit the disease to others. In a dramatic about-face, WHO then backtracked on the statement just one day later.8<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n In the days that followed, media and health officials ramped up fear by claiming that you could be sickened by virtually anyone, even when they appeared to be healthy. \u201cThis idea that \u2026 you can be ill even though you have no symptoms and you can be a \u2026 virus threat to someone else even though you have no symptoms, that\u2019s also invented in 2020,\u201d Yeadon says.9<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n Alexandra Henrion-Caude, geneticist, former director of research with the French National Institute of Health, is among those who have noticed something off from the start. \u201cI was very puzzled since the very beginning \u2026 I was alert to the fact that what we were living was not quite right.\u201d10<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n She notes that the notion of asymptomatic spread is terrifying because it turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy, because they could be exposing you to SARS-CoV-2. \u201cThis is actually terrible because it denies the capacity of a person to be a healthy person. Because if asymptomatic [spread] exists, then who is healthy? No one.\u201d<\/p>\n What\u2019s more, the \u201cproof\u201d of asymptomatic spread is flawed and fraudulent. The New England Journal of Medicine published an article suggesting the transmission of COVID-19 is possible from an asymptomatic carrier in January 2020.11<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n It was based on a 33-year-old businessman who had met with his business partner from Shanghai, then developed a fever and productive cough. The next evening, he felt better and went back to work January 27.<\/p>\n The writers reported the partner had been \u201cwell with no signs or symptoms of infection, but had become ill on her flight back to China, where she tested positive for 2019-nCoV on January 26.\u201d From this case study, they theorized the virus could be transmitted from asymptomatic carriers. An important point was left out, which is that the researchers did not speak with the partner from Shanghai before publication.<\/p>\n However, Germany\u2019s public health agency, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), did speak with the woman on the phone, and she reported she did have symptoms while in Germany.12<\/span><\/sup> So she was not asymptomatic after all.<\/p>\n The pandemic has twisted reality, leaving the public in a mental fog. \u201cYou\u2019re regularly pledging obedience to things which are not logical,\u201d Catherine Austin-Fitts, assistant secretary, Bush Sr. administration and investment adviser with Solari, Inc., says.13<\/span><\/sup> WHO has changed definitions of herd immunity and pandemic, literally altering reality, and this is just one example.<\/p>\n Censorship and campaigns to discredit those who speak out against the narrative are additional control mechanisms that distort the truth. Bishop Schneider of Kazakhstan says the pandemic measures are very similar to Soviet times where he lived, in that there was only one narrative, and if you said there was another meaning, you were declared an enemy.<\/p>\n \u201cWhen you had another opinion, they said, \u2018You are a conspiracy group. You have a conspiracy theory. You have hate speech. This expression, hate speech, came from the communists.\u201d14<\/span><\/sup> It\u2019s psychological manipulation, based on fear, which makes people act totally irrational. The artificially imposed state of incoherence was even described by Austin-Fitts as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots:15<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n \u201cHuman beings crave coherence. And so if you can put them in a state of incoherence they will literally do anything they can to get back to coherence. It\u2019s a typical torture tactic. \u2018If you just do what I want, I will allow you to go back to a state of coherence.\u2019 So, if you just accept the [vaccine] passports, you\u2019ll be free. Or if you get the vaccination, you\u2019ll just be free.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Further, by declaring small businesses as \u201cnonessential\u201d during lockdowns, they get shut down, while Amazon, Walmart and other big box stores can take over their market share. A major transfer of wealth occurred away from small family-owned businesses to very large, publicly owned businesses that benefited from the digital economy. In the meantime, Austin-Fitts explains:16<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n \u201cThe people on Main St. have to keep paying off their credit cards or their mortgage, so they\u2019re in a debt trap and they\u2019re desperate to get cashflow to cover their debts and expenses.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n In the meantime, you have the Federal Reserve institute a form of quantitative easing where they\u2019re buying corporate bonds, and the guys who are taking up the market share can basically finance \u2014 or their banks can \u2014 at 0% to 1%, when everyone on Main St. is paying 16% to 17% to their credit cards, without income.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n So basically now you\u2019ve got them over a barrel and you can take away their market share, and generally they can\u2019t afford to do what they say because they\u2019re too busy trying to find money to feed their kids.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n If a few people want to control many, how can you get the sheep into the slaughterhouse without them realizing and resisting? \u201cThe perfect thing,\u201d Austin-Fitts says, is invisible enemies, like viruses.17<\/span><\/sup> This ramps up fear so the public believes they need the government to protect them. Another effective tactic is \u201cdivide and conquer,\u201d and the media plays an important role in this, dividing people over shots and masks, for instance.<\/p>\n \u201cWhat COVID-19 is,\u201d Austin-Fitts explains, \u201cis the institution of controls necessary to convert the planet from the democratic process to technocracy. So what we\u2019re watching is a change in control and an engineering of new control systems. So think of this as a coup d\u2019\u00e9tat. It\u2019s much more like a coup d\u2019\u00e9tat than a virus.\u201d18<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former public health official and member of German parliament, agrees, stating that pandemic responses have \u201cnothing to do with hygiene. It has to do with criminology.\u201d19<\/span><\/sup> The global injection campaign is another form of control, one that\u2019s forcing the public to receive experimental shots.<\/p>\n Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which spells out a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. This set of principles was developed to ensure the medical horrors discovered during the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II would never take place again.<\/p>\n But in the current climate of extreme censorship, people are not being informed about the full risks of the shots \u2014 which are only beginning to be uncovered. People are being forced into the shots due to mandates and loss of jobs and personal freedoms, like the ability to travel freely and attend business and social events.<\/p>\n A revolution is occurring, and the experts are hopeful that people will awaken to common sense and resist the totalitarian control that is threatening to take over the globe. Instead, society can be regenerated if people come together and fight back against the encroachment on our liberties.<\/p>\n Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom. \u201cIf they want to make us a machine, if they want to make us slaves, we say no,\u201d Wodarg says. \u201c\u2026 We don\u2019t need you anymore, we are many \u2026 we don\u2019t have to be afraid of any pandemic.\u201d20<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n About the Director<\/strong> <\/p>\n I believe in bringing quality to my readers, which is why I wanted to share some information about the filmmaker, James Patrick, from \u201cPlanet Lockdown.\u201d Here is a little more about him and what went in to making this film. Thank you James for sharing with us.<\/p>\n What was your inspiration for making this film?<\/strong><\/p>\n I was in Spain when the lockdowns started, studying a PHD in economics. I escaped to southern France and a week later back to the states. I immediately saw the lockdowns as an economic takedown of the middle class rather than a virus mitigation strategy.<\/p>\n I looked into the academic reference of lockdown as a strategy and they were only mentioned twice and strongly recommended against as the damages would be worse than any benefit.<\/p>\n As an ancestor of Patrick Henry and passionate lover of human liberty, I was so upset by the lockdowns and what they meant for our future, I needed to do something about it. Within a few months I embarked on making a documentary film. The situation developed so quickly I began putting the full interviews out and it became an interview series as well.<\/p>\n I was able to get the best and brightest experts in the world to sit down and tell me their story. It is a high level, intimate look at what happened these last two years, from 2 weeks of lockdown to flatten the curve to Lockouts for the unvaccinated.<\/p>\n What do you hope people take away from the film?<\/strong><\/p>\n The film takes the viewer on a journey through the whole COVID saga. The film and the full interviews forms an educational body of work that helps the public understand what is going on, how we got here, where are we and where this is headed if we don\u2019t put a stop to this. Enough damage has been done. We have to make sure this never happens again or a lot worse things will happen.<\/p>\n Where do the proceeds to your film go?<\/strong><\/p>\n Proceeds to the project go to cover the expenses of the film and ongoing interview series. These include travel, equipment, and payment for cameramen, sound, edits, audio technicians and web hosting expenses. We have done this project on a shoestring budget and donations are critical to keeping this high quality content coming to earn the public about what is happening and what is to come.<\/p>\n No other film project is addressing the situation from an international perspective, which is required to have a full understanding of what is happening. This is a global operation. We work with colleagues in UK, EU and Africa to capture the situation. We are doing this project as a public service and it isn\u2019t free. To date it has been driven by people contributing their time unpaid, myself especially, so donations help covers these out of pocket expenses incurred.<\/p>\n Click the button below to help support the filmmakers.<\/strong><\/p>\n >>>>> Donate Now<\/a> <<<<<<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Read original article here <\/a><\/p>\nQuestionable Practices Urged for COVID-19 Diagnosis<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\u2018Fear Everyone\u2019 Became the Message<\/h2>\n
In a State of Incoherence, People Crave Normalcy<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
New Control Systems Are Being Engineered<\/h2>\n
In the End, Truth Will Win<\/h2>\n
\n\n
\n \n ![\"donate](\"https:\/\/media.mercola.com\/ImageServer\/public\/2022\/March\/donate-now-red-button.jpg\")
<\/div>\n<\/p>\n