No news is bad news<\/span> \n Your contributions<\/b> will help us continue
\n Support The Journal<\/span><\/p>\n
\n to deliver the stories that are important to you\n <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
[ad_1]<\/p>\n
SEXUAL ABUSE SURVIVORS have said that making a statement to garda\u00ed can be re-traumatising, according to new research by One in Four.<\/p>\n
The organisation is today launching research into the experience of 15 child sexual abuse survivors on their journey through the criminal justice system.<\/p>\n
Participants had very mixed experiences of making a statement to garda\u00ed, with some describing how upsetting and re-traumatising this was.<\/p>\n
The participants call for reform within the criminal justice system, including the need for skilled support during the process; specialist trauma informed training for garda\u00ed and legal professionals; reducing delays in proceedings; and a code of conduct governing the manner in which questioning can take place during a trial.<\/p>\n
The research, The Victim Experience in Focus, found that:\n<\/p>\n
Some participants cited fear of upsetting family members as a major factor in deciding whether or not to make a complaint.<\/p>\n
In five cases, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) decided not to proceed with the case to trial and participants described how this made them feel as if their experience did not matter.<\/p>\n
Of the cases that proceeded to trial, a guilty plea was entered in six cases and four jury trials resulted in a conviction.<\/p>\n
\u2018Slicing myself open\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n The research heard reports of how painful and re-traumatising reporting sexual abuse to garda\u00ed can be for a victim.<\/p>\n One survivor said: \u201cIt felt very invasive, like I was slicing myself open, showing this person these really dark places that I\u2019ve never shown anybody \u2026 and then nobody helping you put it back together afterwards, you just have to leave.\u201d<\/p>\n Participants in the research noted that the stop-start nature of recording a statement by hand and the sterile environment of an interview room added to the difficulty of making a statement.<\/p>\n Once their experience was reported to the garda\u00ed, participants said the lengthy process of a criminal investigation and decision by the DPP to bring the case to trial or not was challenging and often triggered emotions linked to the abuse.<\/p>\n Based on the recollection of 10 participants, the average time between their statement and notification of the decision to prosecute was approximately 2.2 years.<\/p>\n Participants also reported being profoundly affected by the quality and quantity of communication and updates they received from garda\u00ed during this period. The majority of participants reported a lack of regular updates or information from garda\u00ed.<\/p>\n One abuse survivor said: \u201cI hate silence. I have been silenced my whole life so to walk out of a room and think \u2018what happens next?\u2019 is like feeling abused again\u201d.<\/p>\n Another said:<\/p>\n I remember one time ringing and the guard was just really annoyed that I was ringing and he said something like, \u2018Have you seen the news of how much credit card fraud there\u2019s been this week? We don\u2019t have time for this.\u2019<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Five of the participants of this study reported that their criminal complaint resulted in a decision not to prosecute by the DPP, marking the end of their criminal redress process.<\/p>\n No news is bad news<\/span> \n Your contributions<\/b> will help us continue\n
\n #Open journalism<\/span><\/p>\n
\n Support The Journal<\/span><\/p>\n
\n to deliver the stories that are important to you\n <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n