{"id":34575,"date":"2022-08-08T02:05:22","date_gmt":"2022-08-08T02:05:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cjstudents.com\/?p=34575"},"modified":"2022-08-08T02:05:22","modified_gmt":"2022-08-08T02:05:22","slug":"oklahoma-watch-what-legislators-did-instead-of-funding-voter-approved-criminal-justice-reforms-govt-and-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cjstudents.com\/index.php\/2022\/08\/08\/oklahoma-watch-what-legislators-did-instead-of-funding-voter-approved-criminal-justice-reforms-govt-and-politics\/","title":{"rendered":"Oklahoma Watch: What legislators did instead of funding voter-approved criminal justice reforms | Govt-and-politics"},"content":{"rendered":"

[ad_1]<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Oklahoma voters sent a message in 2016: Stop sending people to prison on minor drug and property crimes. Direct money saved to counties for drug and mental health treatment.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

State lawmakers still haven\u2019t gotten the second half of that.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Nearly seven years later, not a dime has been invested in the County Community Safety Investment Fund, established by passage of State Question 781<\/a> to cover the costs of treatment in all 77 counties.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Check out our latest digital-only offer and subscribe now<\/a><\/div>\n
\n

That\u2019s where the burden shifted when voters approved State Question 780<\/a>, reclassifying many drug-related felonies and sending offenders to county jails rather than state prisons.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

People are also reading\u2026<\/h3>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n

Instead, legislators have been appropriating funds into a separate diversion program managed by state agencies.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cRather than appropriate dollars to this fund, they\u2019ve appropriated directly to individual agencies or programs that are \u2014 I think the word they used was \u2018in the spirit of the State Question 780\u2019 \u2014 related back to mental health and things like that,\u201d said Caden Cleveland, a spokesman for the state Office of Management and Enterprise Services.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

When 58% of voters supported reclassifying low-level offenses and 56% voted to channel the saving to counties for treatment, they weren\u2019t casting ballots for the spirit of the law, said Damion Shade, executive director of Oklahomans For Criminal Justice Reform.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cIt is entirely true to say that they have invested in some diversion programs,\u201d Shade said. \u201cThe diversion programs that they have invested in are not the diversion programs and not the resources that voters demanded. It\u2019s not.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cThat\u2019s just a material fact. When they say they\u2019re fulfilling the spirit of the law, that means that they are not fulfilling the letter of the law.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\u2018Zero dollars\u2019<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
\n

One such diversion program is Smart on Crime, which was intended to reduce the incarceration cost on the state by getting people into treatment programs. There\u2019s an important distinction: While addressing problems of mental health and substance abuse in state prisons, Smart on Crime doesn\u2019t allot funds specifically for counties.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\n
\n <\/span><\/p>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n \"Oklahoma\n <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Gov. Kevin Stitt\u2019s first budget proposed that the Legislature put $10 million into the fund in 2020. State lawmakers never appropriated it. Stitt administration spokesperson Carly Atchison declined Oklahoma Watch requests.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

A state financial report on County Community Safety Investment Fund couldn\u2019t be generated by the state Office of Management and Enterprise Services, Cleveland said. He said if he pulled the report it would say \u201czero dollars.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

It took nearly five years for the Legislature to work with criminal justice advocates and the state Department of Corrections and agree on how to calculate the savings from voter-approved sentencing changes.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

State Rep. Justin Humphrey, chairman of the House Committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, said the unclear language of State Question 780 contributed to the delay.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cIt had no expectations of what\u2019s going to happen to all these people,\u201d said Humphrey, R-Lane.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Yet Shade said the state question was clear in its intent that all 77 counties could have funding for mental health courts, drug courts and sentencing-diversion programs.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cWe don\u2019t want people struggling with addiction behind bars,\u201d Shade said. \u201cWe want them with doctors getting treatment and getting better, to whatever extent that is possible.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The need in counties<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
\n

Rural county drug court administrators said they need the funds set forth in State Question 781. Noel Bagwell, executive director of the Payne County Drug Court, said the funds would further existing services such as drug testing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Even in Oklahoma County \u2014 with a drug court graduation rate over 80% \u2014 staffing levels are dangerously low and funding is lacking for housing assistance, indigent drug testing and transportation, said Oklahoma County Drug Court Judge Kenneth Stoner.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cPeople have to go to treatment. They have to come to court. They have to come down to take a drug test. And so we have to buy lots of bus passes,\u201d Stoner said. \u201cAnd, frankly, we don\u2019t really get funding for bus passes. We just have to try to figure out how to help people.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Said Bagwell: \u201cAt the end of the day, we\u2019ve got to be sure that we\u2019ve done everything possible for our clientele. Funding would make that more possible.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Robert Hicks graduated from Oklahoma County Drug Court in July. He had been trapped in a cycle of addiction since age 14, and he\u2019s been incarcerated several times. Now approaching 60, Hicks said his life changed in 2020 after police pulled him over while he was driving under the influence of pills.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cI had my grandson in the car with me when I got pulled over, and they put a child endangerment charge on me,\u201d Hicks said. \u201cAnd I thought about what could have happened to him. \u2026<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cIt just made me see what I had been doing and how many chances I took and how many times I had gotten away with it. That was really the final straw, and I couldn\u2019t do this anymore.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Among the 36 bills Humphrey authored during the 2022 legislative session is one that would force legislators to appropriate funds to the County Community Safety Investment Fund. The bill<\/a> passed the House unanimously but was never heard in the Senate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Yet after authoring House Bill 3294, Humphreys said he was surprised to learn that some money has been set aside. He is hosting an interim study this fall in hopes of learning more.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cThe hope is that we quit talking and we actually develop a bill, \u2026 so I would say creating real legislation that results in real action to change our entire criminal justice system and begin to work on community corrections, progressive discipline, real data, and real accountability with actions toward criminal behaviors and substance abuse behavior,\u201d Humphrey said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n