[ad_1]<\/p>\n
Steve Bannon, a longtime ally of former President Donald Trump, said Tuesday that he expects to be charged soon in a state criminal case in New York City.<\/p>\n
Bannon, 68, plans to turn himself in on Thursday, according to a person familiar with the matter. <\/p>\n
The Washington Post, citing anonymous sources, reported that the state criminal case would resemble an earlier attempted federal prosecution, in which Bannon was accused of duping donors who gave money to fund a wall on the U.S. southern border.<\/p>\n
That federal case ended abruptly, before trial, when Trump pardoned Bannon.<\/p>\n
The Manhattan district attorney\u2019s office declined comment late Tuesday.<\/p>\n
In a statement, Bannon said District Attorney Alvin Bragg \u201chas now decided to pursue phony charges against me 60 days before the midterm election,\u201d accusing the Democratic prosecutor of targeting him because he and his radio show are popular among Trump\u2019s Republican supporters.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe SDNY did the exact same thing in August 2020 to try to take me out of the election,\u201d Bannon said, referring to his arrest months before Trump\u2019s re-election loss.<\/p>\n
Federal agents pulled Bannon from a luxury yacht off the Connecticut coast and arrested him on charges he pocketed more than $1 million in wall donations.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt didn\u2019t work then, it certainly won\u2019t work now,\u201d the former White House strategist said. \u201cThis is nothing more than a partisan political weaponization of the criminal justice system.\u201d<\/p>\n
Bannon, who had pleaded not guilty, was dropped from the federal case when Trump pardoned him on his last day in office in January 2021.<\/p>\n
Two other men involved in the \u201cWe Build the Wall\u201d project pleaded guilty in April. They had been scheduled to be sentenced this week, but that was recently postponed to December. A third defendant\u2019s trial ended in a mistrial in June after jurors said they could not reach a unanimous verdict.<\/p>\n
A president can only pardon federal crimes, not state offenses, but that doesn\u2019t mean state-level prosecutors have carte blanche to try similar cases.<\/p>\n
In 2019, then-Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. brought state mortgage fraud charges against Trump\u2019s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort in what was widely seen as an attempt to hedge against a possible pardon.<\/p>\n
But a judge threw the case out on double jeopardy grounds, finding that it was too similar to a federal case that resulted in Manafort\u2019s conviction. (Manafort was later pardoned by Trump).<\/p>\n
While Manafort\u2019s New York case was pending, New York eased its double jeopardy protections, ensuring that state-level prosecutors could pursue charges against anyone granted a presidential pardon for similar federal crimes. <\/p>\n
Bannon\u2019s case differs because he was dropped from the federal case in its early stages. In most cases, double jeopardy is only a factor when a person has been convicted or acquitted of a crime.<\/p>\n
In another case not covered by Trump\u2019s pardon, Bannon was convicted in July on contempt charges for defying a congressional subpoena from the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. He is scheduled to be sentenced in October and faces up to two years in federal prison.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n